Tvijo wiki
Catalog

Topics

AI integrations for Marketing: capabilities and checks

85 source catalog entries, action and trigger counts, and practical checks before connecting a system.

Explore marketing integrations

This directory contains 85 application entries from the Activepieces public-card snapshot observed on 30 October 2026. It helps you shortlist a system before designing a connection. An entry describes an upstream catalog listing; it does not certify a working Tvijo connection, current account permissions, product licensing or successful execution.

The counts below are calculated from the extracted action and trigger lists. They are historical source observations. Follow the individual source card to check changes. A trigger describes an event that can start a workflow; it is not necessarily an MCP callable action. Parameter names and types were absent from this card dataset, so these numbers cannot be used to generate executable tool schemas.

Application directory

Application and source Listed actions Listed triggers Source authentication label
ActiveCampaign 7 9 Custom auth
Bannerbear 11 1 API key
Beehiiv 8 4 API key
Bettermode 5 3 Custom auth
Bird 3 0 Custom auth
Bitly 6 1 Custom auth
Brevo 7 8 API key
Buffer 3 3 API key
Buttondown 4 3 API key
Campaign Monitor 21 4 API key
Cloutly 2 0 API key
Constant Contact 2 0 OAuth 2.0
Contentful 4 0 Custom auth
Contiguity 3 0 API key
ConvertKit 36 12 API key
customer.io 3 1 Custom auth
Dittofeed 3 0 Custom auth
Drip 33 10 API key
Dub 6 2 API key
Elastic Email 11 0 API key
EmailOctopus 8 5 API key
Facebook Leads 1 1 OAuth 2.0
Facebook Pages 3 0 OAuth 2.0
Fathom Analytics 6 0 API key
FeedHive 8 2 API key
Foreplay 6 3 API key
Frame 1 3 API key
GetResponse 6 0 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
GhostCMS 6 6 Custom auth
Giftbit 1 0 API key
Google Ads 8 1 OAuth 2.0
Google My Business 7 1 OAuth 2.0
Google Search Console 9 0 OAuth 2.0
Hootsuite 4 2 OAuth 2.0
Inbox 7 6 Basic auth
Influencers.club 4 0 API key
InstaCharts 1 0 OAuth 2.0
Instantly.ai 6 2 API key
Instasent 3 0 Custom auth
Klaviyo 11 2 API key or OAuth 2.0
Letmepost 5 2 Custom auth
LinkedIn 3 0 OAuth 2.0
Lucidya 0 1 API key
Mailchimp 17 9 OAuth 2.0
MailerLite 11 4 API key
Maileroo 4 0 Custom auth
Mailgun 9 8 Custom auth
Manychat 7 0 API key
Mautic 7 4 Custom auth
Omnisend 6 0 API key
PhantomBuster 2 1 API key
Pinterest 6 3 OAuth 2.0
Plausible Analytics 20 1 API key
Plunk 5 0 Custom auth
Poper 0 1 Not specified
Postiz 9 1 Custom auth
PromoteKit 14 3 API key
ProvenExpert 6 0 Custom auth
Quizell 8 0 API key
Reachinbox 13 7 API key
Reoon Email Verifier 3 0 API key
Robolly 2 0 API key
Saastic 3 0 API key
Sender 8 7 API key
SendFox 4 0 API key
SendIt 10 3 API key
Sendr 19 4 API key
Sendy 10 0 Custom auth
Senja 6 1 API key
seven 4 1 API key
Smaily 3 0 Custom auth
SmartLead 7 1 API key
Smoove 4 4 API key
Systeme.io 15 6 API key
Talkable 14 0 Custom auth
Tapfiliate 5 0 API key
Tarvent 27 17 Custom auth
TimelinesAI 11 7 API key
Total CMS 23 3 Custom auth
Trust 12 1 Custom auth
Typefully 9 1 API key
VBOUT 10 0 API key
Webflow 13 1 OAuth 2.0
Wistia 8 2 API key
WordPress 5 1 Custom auth

Make a shortlist useful

  1. Write the business question and the smallest dataset required. Use synthetic examples for the first test.
  2. Check the original vendor's API and authentication documentation. Identify who owns the account and the permission scope.
  3. Obtain an actual MCP tool list and input schemas from a configured server. Review each selected action; a label such as Get or List alone does not prove read-only behavior.
  4. Check missing-permission handling, result limits, credential isolation and data visibility. Keep writes disabled until their approval and idempotency behavior have been tested.
  5. Store the source version, setup version, test input and observed result. Advance readiness only for the connection and scope that actually passed.

Exercise: choose two applications from this list and prepare a one-page comparison: task, input data, source URL, authentication, known limits, missing evidence and the next safe test. You can use this method independently of Tvijo.

Acceptance: another person can reproduce your source check and distinguish a catalog entry from a configured, protocol-tested, sandbox-tested or production-enabled connection. No real credentials belong in that comparison.

Understand the limits

The upstream related-app list primarily groups apps by category; it does not establish a data flow or functional dependency. Missing categories remain explicit rather than being guessed. The source's generic license label is an observation about the card, not an independent legal assessment of the vendor or every component. No vendor account has been connected by this publication.

Explore the MCP learning and integration section and AI process learning section. For evidence-based learning, see from knowledge to practice. These guides explain how a potential Tvijo workflow becomes a tested capability without turning catalog presence into a product promise.

Sources

Source links and observation dates are recorded below. Review status is stated for each material.

  1. Activepieces public MCP catalog Β· Checked 2026-10-30 Β· Historical public-card snapshot; individual source links appear in the directory.

πŸ’¬ Comments

Comments are public and moderated. Do not post personal data.
  • No comments yet. Be the first!

Next steps