Tvijo wiki
Каталог

Теми

AI integrations for Productivity: capabilities and checks

86 source catalog entries, action and trigger counts, and practical checks before connecting a system.

Цю сторінку ще не перекладено. Ви читаєте англійський оригінал.

Explore productivity integrations

This directory contains 86 application entries from the Activepieces public-card snapshot observed on 30 October 2026. It helps you shortlist a system before designing a connection. An entry describes an upstream catalog listing; it does not certify a working Tvijo connection, current account permissions, product licensing or successful execution.

The counts below are calculated from the extracted action and trigger lists. They are historical source observations. Follow the individual source card to check changes. A trigger describes an event that can start a workflow; it is not necessarily an MCP callable action. Parameter names and types were absent from this card dataset, so these numbers cannot be used to generate executable tool schemas.

Application directory

Application and source Listed actions Listed triggers Source authentication label
Acuity Scheduling 8 2 OAuth 2.0
AddEvent 9 2 API key
Airparser 2 1 API key
Airtable 15 2 API key
AITable 4 1 Custom auth
AltTextify 2 0 API key
Asana 2 0 OAuth 2.0
Assembled 6 3 API key
Baserow 14 7 Custom auth
Beamer 5 1 API key
Beebole 8 0 API key
Bika.ai 7 0 Custom auth
Browse AI 4 2 API key
Cal.com 1 3 API key
Calendly 6 2 API key
Canny 5 4 API key
Carbone 8 0 API key
ClickUp 31 30 OAuth 2.0
Clockodo 33 2 Custom auth
Coda 35 1 API key
Cognito Forms 10 2 API key
CyberArk 17 0 Custom auth
Dashworks 2 0 API key
Fathom 11 1 OAuth 2.0 or API key
Fireflies.ai 5 1 API key
Glide 6 0 API key
Google Calendar 9 7 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
Google Sheets 27 4 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
Google Tasks 2 1 OAuth 2.0
Granola 3 2 API key
Grist 5 2 Custom auth
Harvest 11 0 OAuth 2.0
Hedy 19 5 Custom auth
iMeetify 0 1 Not specified
Jira Cloud 17 9 Custom auth
Jira Data Center 15 3 Custom auth
Katana 4 0 API key
Kimai 2 0 Custom auth
Kissflow 2 0 Custom auth
Linear 13 8 API key
MeisterTask 13 9 OAuth 2.0
Mem 4 0 API key
Microsoft Excel 365 33 4 OAuth 2.0
Microsoft OneNote 7 1 OAuth 2.0
Microsoft Outlook 12 3 OAuth 2.0
Microsoft Outlook Calendar 4 0 OAuth 2.0
Microsoft To Do 13 4 OAuth 2.0
monday.com 9 2 API key
Motion 7 1 API key
Nifty 17 3 OAuth 2.0
Ninety 14 3 API key
Notion 15 4 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
Okta 10 1 Custom auth
PDF.co 34 0 API key
PeekShot 2 0 API key
Productboard 4 3 API key
Produktly 15 4 API key
Quickbase 7 2 Custom auth
Raindrop 6 0 OAuth 2.0
Readwise 3 1 API key
Retable 7 0 API key
SavvyCal 15 3 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
Scrapeless 6 0 API key
Serpstat 3 0 API key
ServiceNow 17 3 Custom auth
SignNow 8 5 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
SimpliRoute 35 0 API key
SimplyPrint 63 62 OAuth 2.0
Slite 9 0 API key
Smartsheet 6 4 API key
SmartSuite 25 2 Custom auth
Taskade 40 6 API key
Teable 17 2 OAuth 2.0 or Custom auth
Teamhood 8 3 Custom auth
Teamwork 18 7 Custom auth
TidyCal 1 3 API key
TimeOps 6 4 API key
tl;dv 5 2 API key
Todoist 5 1 OAuth 2.0
Toggl Track 33 7 API key or Custom auth
Trello 9 3 Basic auth
Village 40 0 API key
Webling 1 2 Custom auth
Weekdone 14 0 OAuth 2.0
Weekdone 5 2 OAuth 2.0
Wrike 9 3 OAuth 2.0

Make a shortlist useful

  1. Write the business question and the smallest dataset required. Use synthetic examples for the first test.
  2. Check the original vendor's API and authentication documentation. Identify who owns the account and the permission scope.
  3. Obtain an actual MCP tool list and input schemas from a configured server. Review each selected action; a label such as Get or List alone does not prove read-only behavior.
  4. Check missing-permission handling, result limits, credential isolation and data visibility. Keep writes disabled until their approval and idempotency behavior have been tested.
  5. Store the source version, setup version, test input and observed result. Advance readiness only for the connection and scope that actually passed.

Exercise: choose two applications from this list and prepare a one-page comparison: task, input data, source URL, authentication, known limits, missing evidence and the next safe test. You can use this method independently of Tvijo.

Acceptance: another person can reproduce your source check and distinguish a catalog entry from a configured, protocol-tested, sandbox-tested or production-enabled connection. No real credentials belong in that comparison.

Understand the limits

The upstream related-app list primarily groups apps by category; it does not establish a data flow or functional dependency. Missing categories remain explicit rather than being guessed. The source's generic license label is an observation about the card, not an independent legal assessment of the vendor or every component. No vendor account has been connected by this publication.

Explore the MCP learning and integration section and AI process learning section. For evidence-based learning, see from knowledge to practice. These guides explain how a potential Tvijo workflow becomes a tested capability without turning catalog presence into a product promise.

Джерела

Нижче наведено джерела та дати спостережень. Статус перевірки зазначено для кожного матеріалу.

  1. Activepieces public MCP catalog · Перевірено 2026-10-30 · Historical public-card snapshot; individual source links appear in the directory.

💬 Коментарі

Коментарі публічні та модеруються. Не публікуйте персональні дані.
  • Коментарів ще немає. Будьте першим!

Наступні кроки