For consultants & advisors
Open with findings, not a maturity questionnaire
AI governance engagements have a structural problem: discovery eats the budget, the deliverable is a document, and the document is stale within a quarter. A free technical check on the client's own product changes the first meeting, and a published record structure gives your report something durable to cite.
What makes these engagements hard
- Half the budget goes into chasing teams for a list of what AI they run.
- The findings decay immediately, so the value you delivered is invisible six months later.
- Clients ask "what tool do we use for this?" and the honest answer has been "a spreadsheet".
- Your recommendations are only as good as the client's ability to evidence them afterwards.
What you get to work with
Every capability on this page carries its real status: shipped code, work we do inside a pilot, or a design we have not built yet.
A free check you can run in the first meeting
Live todayPoint it at the client's product and get concrete findings — keys in bundles, direct provider calls, missing governance surfaces — with evidence and severity. No account, and the client sees the same report you do.
A published record structure to cite
Live todayThe evidence-pack page lists every field with its real status, so your report can reference a structure the client can check rather than a promise from a vendor deck.
Comparisons you can forward without becoming a salesperson
Live todayOur comparison pages say where Portkey, LiteLLM, Langfuse, LangSmith, Credo AI and n8n are the better answer. Send them to a client as-is.
Referral attribution handled server-side
Live todayThe partner program tracks attribution on our side with published terms and a dashboard, instead of asking you to trust a spreadsheet.
How advisors use it
1. Run the check live
Live todayIt produces specific findings about the client's own product in the first meeting, which beats a maturity questionnaire as an opener.
2. Anchor the report to the field list
Live todayRecommend records the client can actually keep, and mark honestly which of those exist in tooling today.
3. Bring us in only where it fits
Pilot scopeIf the client needs a running gateway today, say so — we do not have one, and a referral into the wrong problem costs you more than it pays.
What exists today
- The referral program is live: server-side attribution, a partner dashboard and published terms.
- The external check works on any product you are asked to review — free, no account.
- The comparison and evidence pages are written to be forwarded to a client, including the parts where competitors win.
What we do not claim
- We do not certify anyone and there is no badge for your engagement.
- We hold no SOC 2 attestation — if your client requires one today, say so; we would rather lose the deal than be misquoted in your report.
- We do not publish client names or case studies we cannot substantiate.
- There is no gateway, BYOK vault or evidence export in the product today. If your recommendation depends on those, it depends on a roadmap.
- The partner program pays on attributed business, not on introductions in the abstract.
Questions people actually ask
Can I use the external check inside a client engagement?
Yes. It is free, needs no account, and the report is shown in full — you can run it live on a product you have been asked to review.
What can I honestly promise the client Tvijo does today?
External discovery, a published record structure, published pricing, and pilot work to build an inventory and oversight records. Not a running control plane for their traffic — that is design intent.
How does referral attribution work?
Server-side, with a partner dashboard and published terms, rather than trust-based reporting.
Do you compete with our advisory work?
No. We do not staff engagements. The assessment, the risk judgement and the client relationship stay yours.
What if another tool fits the client better?
Tell them. Our comparison pages exist precisely so that conversation can happen without anyone fudging it.
Talk to us as a partner, not a lead
Tell us what your engagements look like and where the tooling gap sits. If a referral relationship makes sense, we will point you at the terms rather than into a funnel.
Prefer to check us first? The record structure is written out field by field on the evidence page, and the external check shows its full report without an email.
Also useful
Server-side referral attribution and published terms.
Evidence pack structureField by field: what a record can hold, what exists today, what is design.
How Tvijo comparesPortkey, LiteLLM, Langfuse, LangSmith, Credo AI, n8n — what each does better.
External AI Exposure CheckFree, no signup — what your product reveals about its AI from the outside.